Haper Canyon (Encina Hills) Subdivison

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2003071157
Lead Agency
Monterey County
Document Title
Haper Canyon (Encina Hills) Subdivison
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/13/2015
Present Land Use
Z: Rural Density Residential/Design Control District/Low Density Residential; GP: Rural Density Residential/Low Density Residential
Document Description
1) A Vesting Tentative Map for the subdivision of 344 acres into 17 residential lots ranging in size from 5.13 acres to 23.42 acres on 164 acres with one 180-acre remainder parcel; 2) Use Permit for the removal of approximately 79 coast live oak trees over six inches in diameter for road and driveway constructions; 3) Use Permit for development on slopes in excess of 30 percent; 4) a Use Permit for the creation of a public water system with a stand-alone treatment facility (Option B); and 5) grading for net cut and fill approximately 2,000 cubic yards.

Contact Information

Name
Laura M. Lawrence
Agency Name
Monterey County Resource Management Agency Planning Dept.
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Monterey, Salinas
Counties
Monterey
Cross Streets
SR68 and San Benancio Road
Zip
93908
Total Acres
344
Parcel #
416-611-001-000 and 416-611-002-000
State Highways
68
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
San Benancio Middle School
Waterways
El Toro Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
County of Monterey
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print