EID 91-16 NORTH RICHMOND SHORELINE SPECIFIC PLAN
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1993103749
Lead Agency
City of Richmond
Document Title
EID 91-16 NORTH RICHMOND SHORELINE SPECIFIC PLAN
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/15/2001
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement 2001-0423, pursuant to Section 1603 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Stan Davis, Bay Area Wetlands LLC. As part of the Breuner Marsh Restoration project, the operator proposes to remove the existing Goodrick Avenue box culvert crossing and the flood control berm along the north bank of Rheem Creek in Richmond, Contra Costa County. The existing concrete box culvert (17'x18'), along with the concrete wing walls and apron (11' up and downstream) will be removed and the creek restored to conform to the up and downstream channel configuration. In addition, the upper portion of the north bank ( 2.5-4.5' above mean high water), starting at the confluence with San Pablo Bay upstream approximately 1,500 linear ft. , will be excavated to create a 3:1 slope to restore the historic flood plain on the north side. Excavated materials, totaling approximately 20,000 yards of fill and rock riprap, will be hauled off site. The project is located on Rheem Creek at Goodrick Avenue in Richmond, Contra Costa County
Contact Information
Name
Greg Martinelli
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Richmond
Counties
Contra Costa
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.