City of Mendota Final ISMND Mendota Valley Agricultural Holdings Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2020110237
Lead Agency
City of Mendota
Document Title
City of Mendota Final ISMND Mendota Valley Agricultural Holdings Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/15/2021
Present Land Use
General Plan Designation: Public/Quasi-Public Facility
Zoning: Public Facilities with Commercial Cannabis Overlay District (P-F/CO)
Document Description
The project proposes to develop a 59-acre commercial cannabis facility including cultivation, processing, and distribution. Consistent with the provisions of the Mendota Municipal Code, the Mendota Planning Commission has approved a conditional use permit and made recommendations to the Mendota City Council regarding a general plan amendment, a rezone, and a development agreement in conjunction with the project.
Contact Information
Name
Jeffrey O'Neal, City Planner
Agency Name
City of Mendota
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Email
Name
Agency Name
Valley Agricultural Holdings LLC
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Mendota
Counties
Fresno
Regions
Citywide
Cross Streets
Belmont Avenue north of Guillan Park Drive
Zip
93640
Total Acres
59
Parcel #
013-030-68ST
State Highways
California
Railways
Tracks 0.75 mi SE
Airports
William Robert Johnston Municipa
Schools
Mendota, McCabe, and Washington Elementary Schools and Mendota J
Waterways
NA
Township
13S
Range
15E
Section
32
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Mendota
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes