Summerfield at Twin Cities Road Project
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2020050583
Lead Agency
City of Galt
Document Title
Summerfield at Twin Cities Road Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/22/2020
Document Description
The proposed project would include annexation of the 58-acre site into the City of Galt and development of a private, gated community consisting of 211 single-family residences with a minimum lot size of 6,500 square feet (sf). The project would include a new internal circulation system, as well as fencing, landscaping, and associated improvements. The proposed project would also include development of a 2.2-acre private park in the center of the site, as well as 7.9 acres of open space, along the northern portion of the site. The following discretionary approvals from the City of Galt would be required for the proposed project: Annexation; a General Plan Amendment; Pre-zoning; and a Small Lot and a Large Lot Vesting Tentative Map. It should be noted that the project site is not included on any of the lists of sites enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code including, but not limited to, lists of hazardous waste facilities, land designated as hazardous waste property, and hazardous waste disposal sites.
Contact Information
Name
Craig Hoffman
Agency Name
City of Galt Community Development Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Sheldon Business Park LTD 8940 Elder Creek Road Sacramento, CA 95829
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Galt
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Twin Cities Road, Waldo Road and Hauschildt Road
Parcel #
148-110-006
Other Location Info
Generally located on the north side of Twin Cities Road, between Waldo Road and Hauschildt Road in Sacramento County (APN 148-110-006)
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Galt
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes