State Route 12 Capital Preventive Maintenance Project - NOD
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2020019007
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 4
(DOT)
Document Title
State Route 12 Capital Preventive Maintenance Project - NOD
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/1/2020
Present Land Use
Transportation
Document Description
The State Route (SR) 12 Capital Preventive Maintenance (CAPM) Project in Sonoma County, California (Project) proposes to resurface the existing pavement on SR 12, including the shoulders, between Llano Road (Post Mile [PM] 11.0) and Farmers Lane (PM 17.4) from the outskirts of the City of Sebastopol to the City of Santa Rosa in Sonoma County. Additional work includes upgrading 4 curb ramps to meet American with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, replacing up to 38 existing concrete approach slabs with 1.25-foot-thick new slabs, reconstructing drainage infrastructure, and upgrading up to 10,000 linear feet of the existing metal beam guardrail (MBGR) to Midwest Guardrail System (MGS). Along the eastbound SR 12 to southbound U.S. Highway 101 (U.S. 101) connector, a 300-linear-foot drainage system would be reconstructed on the outside shoulder from the end of the existing retaining wall to the existing sound wall. All work proposed would be within the Caltrans right of way (ROW).
Contact Information
Name
Sam Schoevaars
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Caltrans, District 4
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Santa Rosa, Sebastopol
Counties
Sonoma
Cross Streets
Llano Road and Farmers Lane
Zip
95407
State Highways
State Route 12
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Transportation
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes (Categorical Exclusion)
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes