East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Aqueduct Right-of-Way Routine Maintenance (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2020-0032-R2)
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2019129046
Lead Agency
East Bay Municipal Utility District
Document Title
East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Aqueduct Right-of-Way Routine Maintenance (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2020-0032-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/10/2021
Document Description
The Project involves routine maintenance work including sediment and debris removal, vegetation management, crossing and culvert maintenance and repair, structure repair and maintenance, and culvert replacement at sites
along the aqueduct alignment and adjacent waters within the 100-foot-wide EBMUD Right-of-Way
Contact Information
Name
Ian Ralston
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
San Joaquin
Regions
Northern California
Other Location Info
Sierra Foothills, crossing the Central Valley along the Calaveras River, then into the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta
Other Information
Valley Springs, Wallace, Clements, Linden, and Waterloo USGS quadrangles
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerks
Calaveras, San Joaquin
Final Environmental Document Available at
to the general public at the office location listed above for the Lead Agency. CDFW’s record of project approval as Responsible Agency is available at CDFW’s regional office.
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No