Matelot Pipeline and Turbidity Station
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2019110526
Lead Agency
Tuolumne Utilities District
Document Title
Matelot Pipeline and Turbidity Station
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/24/2020
Present Land Use
General Plan: AG (Agricultural), ER (Estate Residential), and P (Public)
Zoning: AIR (airport), O (open space), and AP (agricultural preserve) zoning combining districts to portions of the AE-37 and RE-2 zone districts in the project area. The P (public)() zone district is mapped over lands within the State Historic Park and the Columbia WTP
Document Description
The project would construct an 18-inch diameter raw water main up to 1,650 feet in length that would convey water from Matelot Reservoir to the Columbia Water Treatment Plant. The pipeline would generally run parallel to the existing open-channel Matelot Ditch and would carry a portion of the water that currently runs in the open ditch. The existing Matelot Ditch would still carry water at a reduced flow rate. A turbidity monitoring station would also be constructed on the Columbia Ditch near Matelot Reservoir and would consist of a small building (48 square feet) with sampling equipment.
Contact Information
Name
Jennifer Batt, Associate Engineer
Agency Name
Tuolumne Utilities District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Email
Name
Agency Name
Tuolumne Utilities District
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Columbia
Counties
Tuolumne
Cross Streets
Pine Log Road/Italian Bar Road
Zip
95310
Total Acres
0.75
Parcel #
032-010-076, 032-010-075, 032-070-001, 032-440-009, 032-070-021, 032-010-090
Airports
Columbia
Waterways
Matelot Reservoir, Matelot Gulch (creek)
Township
2N
Range
14E
Section
11/12
Base
Columbia
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Tuolumne Utilities District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No