Operation of Antelope Creek Diversions (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018- 0693-R1
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2019099040
Lead Agency
Resource Conservation District of Tehama County
(RCD-TC)
Document Title
Operation of Antelope Creek Diversions (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018- 0693-R1
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/28/2020
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2018-0693-R1, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicants, Jim Edwards and Los Molinos Mutual Water Company. The project is limited to operation, inspection, maintenance, and repair of water diversion facilities on Antelope Creek and maintenance of the New Creek Apron adjacent to the diversion facilities.
Contact Information
Name
Brad Henderson
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Res. Conservation District of Tehama County
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
Tehama
Other Location Info
The project is located at the Edwards Dam on Antelope Creek, tributary to the Sacramento River, in the County of Tehama, State of California; Latitude 401004.03, Longitude 1220939.35; APN # 049-150-001; 049-150-002.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No