Point Molate Mixed-Use Development Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2019070447
Lead Agency
City of Richmond
Document Title
Point Molate Mixed-Use Development Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/16/2020
Present Land Use
Zoning: Single-family Hillside Res., General Comm., Lint Ind., Parks and Rec., Open Space. GP Destination: Business/Light Ind., Medium Density Res. Low-Density Res., Parks and Rec., Open Space
Document Description
NOD for Second Reading for adoption of ordinances for Zoning and Development Agreement for a 276-acre mixed-use development project with a mix of residential, commercial, (including retail and restaurant), cultural, civic, and transportation uses and 193 acres of parks, trails, and open space.
Contact Information
Name
Lina Velasco
Agency Name
City of Richmond
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Winehaven Legacy LLC
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Richmond
Counties
Contra Costa
Regions
Citywide, San Francisco Bay Area
Cross Streets
Stenmark Drive
Zip
94801
Total Acres
413
Parcel #
561-100-008
State Highways
I-580
Railways
Castro Point Railway, decommissi
Airports
N/A
Schools
Washington Elementary School
Waterways
San Francisco Bay
Township
1N
Range
5W
Section
Unsect
Base
MD
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Richmond
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes