San Marco Commercial Center Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2019069103
Lead Agency
City of Pittsburg
Document Title
San Marco Commercial Center Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/25/2020
Present Land Use
None
Document Description
The proposed project would include development of a commercial center comprised of three buildings and an associated parking lot. A 29,822-square foot (sf) building intended as a grocery store would be located in the southeast corner of the site and would include a truck loading dock in the rear. A 3,500-sf building intended for restaurant use would be constructed in the northwest corner of the site. Finally, a 1,826-sf building also intended for restaurant use would be developed in the northeast corner of the site and would include a drive-through and dine-in service. The project requires approval of a General Plan map amendment and amendments to the San Marco Planned Development District, San Marco Development Plan, and San Marco Development Agreement. Subsequent design review and use permit approvals are also required.
Contact Information
Name
Hector Rojas
Agency Name
City of Pittsburg
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Sierra Pacific Properties
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Pittsburg
Counties
Contra Costa
Zip
94565
Total Acres
3.69
Parcel #
091-050-065 and 091-050-066
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Pittsburg
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes