2017 Storm Damage DWR Rehabilitation Program - CDFW Region 3 Sites (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0171-R3)
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2019049138
Lead Agency
California Department of Water Resources
(DWR)
Document Title
2017 Storm Damage DWR Rehabilitation Program - CDFW Region 3 Sites (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0171-R3)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/26/2020
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2019-0171-R3, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, California Department of Water Resources.
The project includes 23 levee repair sites. The project is limited to erosion and damage repair of levees. This includes mobilization (creating site access and staging areas), site preparation (vegetation clearing and grubbing), excavation, construction (geotextile placement, bedding material placement, rock placement, fill placement, instream woody material and willow pole placement at selected sites), and demobilization (restoration and clean up).
Contact Information
Name
Andrea Boertien
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife Bay Delta Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Sacramento, San Joaquin, Yolo
Other Location Info
The projects are located at the Sacramento River, San Joaquin River, Old River, Georgiana Slough, Yolo Bypass, Steamboat Slough, and Elk Slough, in the Counties of Sacramento, Yolo, and San Joaquin, State of California.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No