Alpine, Amador, and Tuolumne County Culvert Rehabilitation (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0180-R2)
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2018052048
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 10
(DOT)
Document Title
Alpine, Amador, and Tuolumne County Culvert Rehabilitation (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0180-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/13/2020
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2019-0180-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, California Department of Transportation. The project is limited to repair or replacement of existing culverts, temporary de-watering, vegetation removal, and installation or replacement of existing rock slope protection.
Contact Information
Name
Suzanne Gilmore
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Stockton
Counties
San Joaquin
Other Location Info
Thirty-eight (38) projects are located along State Routes (SR) 4, 88, 207, 16, and 49 in Alpine and Amador Counties on intermittent and ephemeral tributaries to the Stanislaus, Mokelumne, Cosumnes and American Rivers. The projects extend between post miles 4.96 and 16.66 on SR 4; 3.14 and 4.75 on SR 88; 0 and 1.19 on SR 207 in Alpine County; and extend between post miles 7.81 and 9.32 on SR 16; 16.31 and 17.50 on SR 49 in Amador County. The Alpine County projects are located approximately 96 miles east on SR-4 and approximately 104 miles east on SR 88 from the City of Stockton. The Amador County projects are located approximately 47 miles east on SR 88 thence SR 124 from the city of Stockton.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No