Alpine County Culvert Rehabilitation and Replacement
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2018052036
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 10
(DOT)
Document Title
Alpine County Culvert Rehabilitation and Replacement
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/10/2021
Document Description
The Caltrans right-of-way (ROW) has been reduced at project locations since the original design was permitted. Due to the reduced ROW, Caltrans may not be able to replace culverts at certain locations in their entirety. The amendment includes the installation of manholes to connect new replacement culvert sections with existing sections. The amendment also includes changes to the project description to remove or reduce the amount of rock slope protection (RSP) originally proposed for installation. As a result of the removed or reduced RSP placement proposed, the temporary and permanent impacts to stream and riparian habitats have been modified.
Contact Information
Name
Ian Boyd
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Email
Location
Cities
Stockton
Counties
Alpine, San Joaquin
Regions
Northern California
Waterways
Silver Creek, Monitor Creek, East fork, and West fork Carson River
Other Location Info
The projects extend between post miles 19.48 and 31.11 on SR 4; 8.10 and 25.14 on SR 88; 6.84 and 18.33 on SR 89; located approximately 100 miles east of the City of Stockton.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Alpine
Final Environmental Document Available at
the general public at the office location listed above for the Lead Agency. CDFW’s record of project approval as Responsible Agency is available at CDFW’s regional office.
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No