State Route 12 Bridge Scour Mitigation Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2018042062
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 4
Document Title
State Route 12 Bridge Scour Mitigation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/19/2018
Present Land Use
hwy/transportation
Document Description
The project would remove the existing Sonoma Creek Bridge and Hooker Creek Bridge and replace them with new bridge structures. At the Sonoma Creek Bridge, the project would remove the existing 46-ft wide bridge, and replace it with a 51-ft wide precast/prestressed type structure. The new structure would be 63 ft long, replacing the existing bridge of the same length. At the Hooker Creek Bridge location, the project would remove the existing 36-ft wide bridge, and replace it with a 45-ft wide PC/PS slab-type structure. The new structure would be 40 ft long, replacing the existing 24-ft long bridge.
Contact Information
Name
Eric DeNardo
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation, District 4
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Santa Rosa, Sonoma
Counties
Sonoma
Cross Streets
SR 12 south of Hoff Rd/SR 12 south of Madrone Rd
Zip
95409/9547
Total Acres
1.53
Parcel #
050-060-ROW/056-020-ROW
State Highways
SR 12
Airports
Graywood Ranch Airport
Schools
Kenwood, Archbishop
Waterways
Sonoma Creek/Hooker Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Caltrans District 4
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.