Capital SouthEast Connector-A1/A2 Kammerer Road Project
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2018022061
Lead Agency
Capital SouthEast Connector Joint Powers Authority
Document Title
Capital SouthEast Connector-A1/A2 Kammerer Road Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/19/2018
Present Land Use
ag, res development, OS
Document Description
The Capital SouthEast Connector Joint Powers Authority proposes to connect SR 99 to I-5 in an east-west alignment. The project will replace an existing portion of Kammerer Road with a four-lane thoroughfare, construct a new four-lane expressway section to I-5, and implement railroad grade separation and interchange improvements. The total length of the Project is approximately 5.75 miles, and may be phased from a 2-lane to a 4-lane facility. The purposes of the Project is to improve regional traffic operations, reduce existing and projected congestion, and provide a vital component of the east-west gap closure.
Contact Information
Name
Derek Minnema
Agency Name
Capital SouthEast Connector Joint Powers Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Elk Grove
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Kammerer Rd between I-5 and SR 99
Zip
95757
Total Acres
385
Parcel #
13401101680000
State Highways
99
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Franklin ES
Waterways
Unnamed tributaries to Stone Lake
Township
6N
Range
5E
Section
13-18
Base
MD
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Capital SouthEast Connector JPA
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.