Tank 1 and Roseburg Water System Improvements Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2017102036
Lead Agency
City of Mount Shasta
Document Title
Tank 1 and Roseburg Water System Improvements Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/16/2021
Document Description
The State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) is a Responsible Agency for the Project. The State Water Board’s Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (SRF) Program is financing the Project. The City of Mt. Shasta proposes to replace the failing, undersized Tank 1 with a 500,000-gallon tank and install new inlet/outlet piping at Tanks 2and 3 to promote water turnover. The Project will also install Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) control features to the system’s Pressure Reducing Valve station, install approximately 1,000 feet of 12-inch water main in McCloud Avenue, and replace approximately 7,500 feet of undersized water main causing low pressures within the Roseburg water system with 12-inch piping.
Contact Information
Name
Gabriel Edwards
Agency Name
State Water Resources Control Board
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Mount Shasta
Counties
Siskiyou
Regions
Citywide
Cross Streets
Various
Zip
96067
State Highways
5, 89
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Sisson School, Mt. Shast HS, Golden Eagle Charter School
Waterways
Lake Siskiyou, Sacramento River, Wagon Creek, Big Canyon Creek, Big Springs Creek, and Cold Spri
Township
40N
Range
4W
Section
15,21
Base
MDM
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
State Water Resources Control Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Siskiyou
Final Environmental Document Available at
305 N. Mt. Shasta Blvd., Mt. Shasta, CA 96067
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes