Yolo County Bridge Replacement (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0246- R2)
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2017072023
Lead Agency
Yolo County
Document Title
Yolo County Bridge Replacement (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0246- R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/17/2020
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Lake and
Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2019-0246-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Yolo County Community Services Department. The County of Yolo Public Works Division is proposing to replace the existing Dry Slough Bridge on County Road 95. The proposed replacement structure will clear span the slough with a single span and will be cast-in-place. The bridge will be approximately 60 feet long and will consist of a post tensioned concrete slab skewed approximately 32 degrees. The bridge foundations will consist of Caltrans Class 140 (Alternative W) 14-inch diameter steel pipe piles. The bridge and roadway embankment adjacent to the slough will be protected with rock slope protection over slope protection fabric.
Contact Information
Name
Ian Boyd
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Yolo County Department of Community
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
Yolo
Other Location Info
The project is located on County Road 95 over Dry Slough in the County of Yolo, State of California, Latitude 38.562312, Longitude -121.85883, Section 4, Township
8N, Range 01 E of the Mt. Diablo Meridian, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangle Merrit.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No