Manor Street Bridge Rehabilitation and Seismic Retrofit Project

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2017021001
Lead Agency
City of Bakersfield
Document Title
Manor Street Bridge Rehabilitation and Seismic Retrofit Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/21/2017
Present Land Use
Z: NA City ROW/GP: NA City ROW
Document Description
The city is proposing to rehabilitate and upgrade the Manor St Bridge at the Kern River to increase bridge safety, provide for a seismic retrofit, and improve roadway geometrics. The primary purposes of the project is to enhance the bridge pedestrian and vehicular safety, through seismic retrofit and roadway geometrics improvements to meet current seismic safety standards and AASITO geometric standards. The proposed project consists of widening the bridge to accommodate two 12-foot lanes, a 2 foot left shoulder, a 6 foot right shoulder, a 6-foot sidewalk and standard barriers. The total project site is approx.. 3 acres, with two proposed potential staging areas.

Contact Information

Name
Navdip Grewal
Agency Name
City of Bakersfield
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Bakersfield
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Manor St between E. Roberts Lane and Denise Ave
Zip
93308
Total Acres
3
State Highways
99
Schools
Highland ES, Standard
Waterways
Kern River
Township
29S
Range
28E
Section
18
Base
MBDM

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City of Bakersfield
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print