OLD TOWN ELK GROVE STREETSCAPE PHASE 2 PROJECT
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016122059
Lead Agency
City of Elk Grove
Document Title
OLD TOWN ELK GROVE STREETSCAPE PHASE 2 PROJECT
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/3/2020
Present Land Use
Public Right of Way
Document Description
This NOD is to document a slight change in the Project Description to include a 3-way traffic signal at Kent St and Elk Grove Blvd, instead of the previously proposed Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon. This is documented in an internal addendum to the approved IS/MND.
Contact Information
Name
John Griffin
Agency Name
City of Elk Grove, Public Works
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
City of Elk Grove
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Elk Grove
Counties
Sacramento
Regions
Citywide
Cross Streets
Elk Grove Boulevard between School Street and Waterman Road
Zip
95624
Total Acres
7
Parcel #
N/A
State Highways
99
Railways
Union Pacific RR
Airports
None
Schools
Arista Preschool
Waterways
Elk Grove Creek Tributary
Township
6N; 7N
Range
6E
Section
6; 31
Base
MD
Other Location Info
Kent Street and Elk Grove Boulevard.
Other Information
3-Way Traffic Signal will be placed at Kent Street and Elk Grove Boulevard.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Elk Grove
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes (Internal Addendum - Not Publicly Circulated)
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes