Gamino Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2020-0039- R1)
226 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016112028
Lead Agency
Mendocino County
Document Title
Gamino Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2020-0039- R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/21/2020
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2020-0039-R1, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to Mr. Juan Carlos Gamino. The project is limited to five (5) encroachments. Four (4) encroachments are for installation of appropriately-sized culverts to replace existing fords. Work for these encroachments will include excavation, placement of new properly sized culverts, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion. One (1) proposed encroachment is to install a rock-filled ford crossing at the location of an existing unimproved ford. Work for this encroachment will include excavation, installation of rock-filled ford crossing, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.
Contact Information
Name
Angela Liebenberg
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
County of Mendocino
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Willits
Counties
Mendocino
Other Location Info
The project to be completed is located within the Eel River watershed, approximately 5 miles southeast of the City of Willits, County of Mendocino, State of California. The project is located in Section 25, T18N, R13W, Mt. Diablo Base and Meridian; in the Laughlin Range U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No