Hunter Water Diversion and Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-08408-R1)
226 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016112028
Lead Agency
Mendocino County
Document Title
Hunter Water Diversion and Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-08408-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/18/2020
Document Description
The project is limited to 1 encroachment(s) The one encroachment is for the evaluation and, if deemed necessary by the Department, maintenance or upgrade of a stream crossing. Work for this encroachment could include excavation, removal of the failing crossings, replacement with new properly sized crossings, backfilling and compaction of fill or restoration of the stream channel and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.
Contact Information
Name
Cheri Sanville
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
County of Mendocino
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Willits
Counties
Mendocino
Other Location Info
The project to be completed is located within the Upper Eel River watershed, approximately 3.8 miles Southeast of the town of Willits, County of Mendocino, State of California. The project is located in Section 27, T18N, R13W, Diablo Mountain Base and Meridian; in the Willits U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle; Assessor's Parcel Number 105-010-02; latitude 39.3905 N and longitude, -123.2907 Wat the first stream crossing.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No