Southeast Plant Headworks Replacement Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016112006
Lead Agency
City and County of San Francisco
Document Title
Southeast Plant Headworks Replacement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/22/2019
Document Description
The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) approved the Southeast Plant (SEP) Headworks Replacement Project to improve the existing SEP preliminary treatment process facilities on February 28, 2017 (San Francisco Public Utilities Resolution No. 17-0043). The project was subsequently modified to add a new lift station and associated pipelines. The modified project would consist of the following components (1) modifications to the Bruce Flynn Pump Station to enhance reliability in wet weather; (2) demolition of the existing headworks facility and influent control structure; and (3) construction of a new 250-mgd headworks with an odor control facility; (4) demolition of the building at 398 Quint Street; and (5) construction of a new Southeast Lift Station and associated piping.
Contact Information
Name
Julie Moore
Agency Name
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Email
Name
Agency Name
City and County of San Francisco
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
San Francisco
Other Location Info
P (Public); M-2 (Industrial); and PDR-2 (Production, Distribution, and Repair) Use Districts 65-J Height and Bulk District
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A