Stonegate Development (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0325-R2)
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016062049
Lead Agency
City of Chico
Document Title
Stonegate Development (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0325-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/4/2019
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2018-0325-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Bruce Road Associates, LP.
Bruce Road Associates, LP (Applicant) proposes to develop a ±314-acre site with a mixture of 423 single-family residential lots, 13.4 acres of multi-family residential land use, 36.6 acres of commercial land uses, 5 acres of proposed storm water facilities, 3.3 acres of park, a pedestrian/bicycle trail, and a 117.3-acre preserve (Project). The 117.3-acre preserve will combine with an adjacent 14.7-acre Doe Mill-Schmidbauer Meadowfoam Preserve into a single 132-acre biological preserve (Stonegate Preserve).
Contact Information
Name
Kursten Sheridan
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Butte
Other Location Info
The project is located at several unnamed tributaries to Butte Creek, in the County of Butte, State of California.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes