University Drive and Ridgeline Drive/Rosa Drew Lane Intersection Improvement Project
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016031053
Lead Agency
City of Irvine
Document Title
University Drive and Ridgeline Drive/Rosa Drew Lane Intersection Improvement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/15/2016
Present Land Use
Transportation/Primary Highway (University Drive) and Secondary Highway (Ridgeline Drive)
Document Description
The City proposes to add an additional through lane on eastbound University Drive from approx. 580 feet west of the intersection with Ridgeline Drive/Rosa Drew Lane, which would taper back to two through lanes approx. 725 feet east of the intersection. A northbound right-turn lane would be added to Ridgeline Drive from approx. 500 feet south of the intersection. The existing left turn pocket on westbound University Drive would be extended by approx. 40 feet. This project also includes new pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pedestrian ramps; modifications to the existing traffic signals to improve traffic operations; construction of low-flow shack dams, vegetated swale, and stormwater/water quality facilities.
Contact Information
Name
Cheryl Lea
Agency Name
City of Irvine
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Irvine
Counties
Orange
Cross Streets
University Drive and Ridgeline Drive/Rosa Drew Lane
Zip
92612
Total Acres
5.8
Parcel #
463-201-30, 481-201-02
State Highways
I-405
Schools
Multiple Schools
Waterways
Sand Canyon Wash, Sand Canyon Reservoir, SD Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Irvine
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.