Kings Beach Pier Relocation and Recreation Improvements Grant
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015122056
Lead Agency
California Department of Parks and Recreation
Document Title
Kings Beach Pier Relocation and Recreation Improvements Grant
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/29/2020
Document Description
The Conservancy will provide funding to the DPR to complete final design and permitting for a portion of the KBSRA General Plan Revision and Kings Beach Pier Rebuild Project (DPR Project), which includes construction of several onshore and pier-related improvements. The improvements include relocating and rebuilding the pier, installing a ramp for non-motorized watercraft to access the Lake, creating new picnic sites, building a visitor contact facility, enhancing vehicular circulation and parking, and improving public access.
Contact Information
Name
Chris Mertens
Agency Name
California Tahoe Conservancy
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Placer
Other Location Info
The improvements designed under this grant will be located on the eastern portion of the Kings Beach State Recreation Area (KBSRA). KBSRA is located in downtown Kings Beach on the north shore of Lake Tahoe in Placer County. KBSRA includes approximately 1,000 feet of Lake Tahoe shoreline and approximately 13.9 acres of beach and upland area owned by the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) and the California Tahoe Conservancy (Conservancy). The improvements will occur entirely on land owned by the DPR. (Exhibit A)
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Tahoe Conservancy
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes