SR-88 Pine Grove Corridor Improvement, Phase A (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0254-R2)
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015102066
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 10
(DOT)
Document Title
SR-88 Pine Grove Corridor Improvement, Phase A (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0254-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/11/2020
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2019-0254-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, California Department of Transportation. The larger scope of work includes improvements to a three-mile segment of SR 88 from Post Mile (PM) 21.6 to PM 24.6. The project is limited to the widening of SR-88, extension of existing culvert, installation of rock slope protection (RSP), and removal of riparian vegetation. The project will be completed when the streams are dry. The project activities will result in approximately 0.042 acre of permanent impacts and 0.088 acre of temporary impacts to areas consisting of bed, bank, and channel habitat within the project area.
Contact Information
Name
Kelsey Vella
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
San Joaquin
Other Location Info
The project is located at the junction of State Route 88 (SR-88) and Liberty Road (Post Mile 22.1) in San Joaquin County, State of California; Latitude 38.236241, Longitude -121.051450. The culvert crosses Liberty Road on the west site of the intersection
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No