Peak Water Diversion and Stream Crossings Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-
549 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015102005
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Peak Water Diversion and Stream Crossings Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/18/2020
Document Description
The project is limited to 15 encroachments. One encroachment is for water
diversion from an unnamed tributary to Rancheria Creek. Water is diverted for domestic use. Work for the water
diversion will include use and maintenance of the water diversion infrastructure. The 14 other proposed
encroachments are to upgrade stream crossings. Work for these encroachments will include excavation,
removal of the failing crossings, replacement with new properly sized crossings, backfilling and compaction of
fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.
Contact Information
Name
Cheri Sanville
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Kevin Peak
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Blue Lake
Counties
Humboldt
Regions
Northern California
Other Location Info
The project to be completed is located within the Redwood Creek watershed, approximately
11.8 miles east southeast of the town of Blue Lake, County of Humboldt, State of California. The project is
located in Section 6, T05N, 04E, Humboldt Base and Meridian; in the Maple Creek U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-
minute quadrangle; Assessor’s Parcel Number 316-191-016; latitude 40.8390 N and longitude -123.7713 W at
one point of diversion (POD-1).
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No