Mammoo Stream Crossing Decommissioning Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0092-R1)
549 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015102005
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Mammoo Stream Crossing Decommissioning Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0092-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/13/2020
Document Description
The project is limited to one encroachment (Table 1) for the decommissioning of a ford stream crossing. Work for this encroachment will involve the removal of any fill within the stream banks, pulling back the slope and installing erosion control and plating with native seeds as appropriate.
The Permittee has disclosed a water well located at approximately 40.4595, -123.6359. This well is presented as the sole source of water for all needs on the property. CDFW did not evaluate hydraulic connection of the well to surface water, nor was a hydrogeologic evaluation prepared by a licensed geologist provided for CDFW review.
See NOD for full details.
Contact Information
Name
Cheri Sanville
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife Northern Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Humboldt
Other Location Info
The project to be completed is located within the Van Duzen River watershed, approximately 8.7 miles east of the town of Bridgeville, County of Humboldt, State of California. The project is located in Section 17, T01N, R05E, Humboldt Base and Meridian; in the Larabee Valley U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle; Humboldt County Assessor’s Parcel Number 210-231-012; latitude/longitude 40.4595, -123.6336 at the stream crossing.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No