Kuhlman Water Diversion, Impoundment and Stream Crossings Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0908-R1)
549 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015102005
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Kuhlman Water Diversion, Impoundment and Stream Crossings Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0908-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/1/2020
Document Description
The project is limited to 6 encroachment(s) (Table 1). One encroachment is for water diversion from a spring tributary to the Van Duzen River. Water is diverted for domestic use and irrigation. Work for the water diversion will include use and maintenance of the water diversion infrastructure. The 5 other proposed encroachments are to upgrade failing and undersized stream crossings. Work for these encroachments will include excavation, removal of the failing crossings, replacement with new properly sized crossings, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.
Contact Information
Name
Cheri Sanville
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife Northern Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Humboldt
Other Location Info
The project to be completed is located within the Lower Eel River watershed, approximately 1.9 miles west southwest the town of Dinsmore, County of Humboldt, State of California. The project is located in Section 8, T01N, R05E, Humboldt Base and Meridian; in the Larabee Valley U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle; Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 210-221-001, 210-221-002, 210-191-050; latitude 40.4834 N and longitude -123.6419 W at the point of diversion (POD).
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No