Cobb Road Association Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600- 2020-0278-R1)
549 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015102005
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Cobb Road Association Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600- 2020-0278-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/10/2020
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2020-0278-R1, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to Dashiell Miller. The project is limited to 11 encroachments. 10 encroachments are to upgrade failing and undersized culverts, and one encroachment is for a new crossing installation. Work for these encroachments will include excavation, removal of the failing culverts, replacement with new properly sized culverts, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.
Contact Information
Name
Scott Bauer
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife Northern Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Humboldt
Other Location Info
The project is located approximately 1.3 miles southeast of the town of Dinsmore, County of Humboldt, State of California. The project is located in Section 11, T1N, R5E, Humboldt Base and Meridian; in the Dinsmore U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle; Assessor’s Parcel Number 208-341-028, 208-341-011, 208-341-009, 208-341- 008, 208-341-032, 208-341-034, 208-341-003, 208-341-004, 208-341-006, 208-341-015, 208-341-016, 208-341-005, 208-341-007; latitude 40.4861 N and longitude -123.5791 Wat Crossing 3.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No