Stoft Water Diversion and Stream Crossings (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0576-R1)
549 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015102005
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Stoft Water Diversion and Stream Crossings (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0576-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/7/2020
Document Description
The project is limited to 10 encroachments. One encroachment is for water diversion from an unnamed tributary to Tom Long Creek. Water is diverted for domestic use. Work for the water diversion will include use and upgrades/maintenance of the water diversion infrastructure. Nine proposed encroachments will upgrade failing and undersized culverts, and unimproved stream crossings. Work for these encroachments will include excavation, removal of the failing culverts, replacement with new properly sized culverts or appropriately designed armored fill crossings, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.
Contact Information
Name
Jonathan Hollis
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 1 - Northern
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Humboldt
Other Location Info
The project to be completed is located within the East Branch South Fork Eel River watershed, near the town of Harris, County of Humboldt, State of California. The project is located in Section 6, T5S, R5E, Humboldt Base and Meridian; in the Harris U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle; Assessor’s Parcel Number 216-073-006; latitude 40.059017° N and longitude 123.655201° W at the point of diversion (POD).
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
N/A
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No