King Site Remediation and Stream Restoration (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMSHUM- 08775-R1)
549 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015102005
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
King Site Remediation and Stream Restoration (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMSHUM- 08775-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/15/2020
Document Description
The project is limited to three encroachments. One encroachment will decommission and remediate a campsite and access road that impact a spring, stream, and bog; proposed work includes grading, scarifying, mulching, and seeding with appropriate vegetation. Another encroachment will decommission and remediate a legacy cultivation area and access road, and restore the affected stream and riparian area; proposed work includes recontouring the bed, bank, channel, and setback areas using native fill materials to restore original morphology, and mulching and seeding with appropriate vegetation. The final encroachment will upgrade failing road conditions and remediate legacy cultivation activities to eliminate or minimize erosion and sediment delivery to the affected stream; proposed work includes removal of the legacy-fill, backfilling and compaction of engineered-fill to prevent downcutting, rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion, and mulching and seeding with appropriate vegetation.
Contact Information
Name
Steven Lazar
Agency Name
Humboldt County Dept. of Planning and Building
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Cities
Eureka
Counties
Humboldt
Parcel #
316-012-008
Waterways
South Fork Trinity River watershed
Township
5N
Range
4E
Section
25
Base
HBM
Other Location Info
Grouse Mountain U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No