Roscoe Water Diversion and Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0537-R1)
549 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015102005
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Roscoe Water Diversion and Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0537-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/12/2020
Document Description
The project is limited to four encroachment(s) (Table 1). One encroachment is for water diversion from a shallow well connected to underflow of the Mattole River. Water is diverted for domestic use, livestock watering and commercial cannabis irrigation. Permittee shall forbear from diverting water from the shallow well for commercial cannabis irrigation from April 1 until October 31 annually, consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Cannabis Policy. Work for the water diversion will include use and maintenance of the water diversion infrastructure, a shallow well located on the banks of the Mattole River. The three other proposed encroachments are to upgrade failing and undersized stream crossings. Work for this/these encroachment(s) will include excavation, removal of the failing crossings, replacement with new properly sized crossings, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.
See NOD for full document description.
Contact Information
Name
Cheri Sanville
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife Northern Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Humboldt
Parcel #
107-321-002
Township
2S
Range
1W
Section
34
Base
HB&M
Other Location Info
The project to be completed is located within the Mattole River watershed, approximately 6.68 miles SE of the town of Petrolia, County of Humboldt, State of California.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No