Salazar Stream Crossing and Pond Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018- 0087-R1)
549 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015102005
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Salazar Stream Crossing and Pond Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018- 0087-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/27/2020
Document Description
The project is limited to two encroachments (Table 1). The first encroachment is to upgrade a failing and undersized stream crossing. Work for this encroachment will include excavation, removal of the failing crossing, replacement with new properly sized crossing, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion. The second encroachment is to evaluate the stability of pond embankment and spillway. If present in the pond, invasive species (e.g. bullfrogs) shall be eradicated.
Contact Information
Name
Cheri Sanville
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Humboldt County
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
Humboldt
Other Location Info
The project to be completed is located within the Eel River watershed, approximately 4 miles SE of the town of Bridgeville, County of Humboldt, State of California. The project is located in Section 32, T01N, R04E, Humboldt Base and Meridian; in the Larabee Valley U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle; Humboldt County Assessor’s Parcel Number 208-321-007; latitude 40.27306 N and longitude 123.67943 W at the stream crossing.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No