Digiallorenzo Water Diversion Infrastructure Removal and Stream Restoration Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0127-R1)
549 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015102005
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Digiallorenzo Water Diversion Infrastructure Removal and Stream Restoration Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0127-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/5/2020
Document Description
The project is limited to three encroachments (Table 1 ). Two encroachments are for removing water diversion infrastructure from points of diversion (POD) on unnamed tributaries to Buck Mountain Creek. No water diversion is authorized by this Agreement. The other proposed encroachment is for stream restoration and revegetation. Work includes removing an in-board ditch that delivers sediment to the stream, out-sloping the road and installing cross drains to prevent sediment delivery. Revegetation will involve replanting native vegetation in the riparian zone lost to unpermitted cannabis cultivation and poorly planned site development.
See NOD for Full Details.
Contact Information
Name
Cheri Sanville
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Humboldt County
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
Humboldt
Other Location Info
The project to be completed is located within the South Fork Eel River watershed, approximately 3.6 miles NE of the town of Garberville, County of Humboldt, State of California. The project is located in Section 21, T04S, R04E, Humboldt Base and Meridian; in the Harris U.S. Geological Survey 7.5- minute quadrangle; Assessor's Parcel Number 223-072-001 ; latitude 40.1048 N and longitude -123. 7292 Wat the stream restoration project.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No