Addendum No. 2 to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Jurupa Community Services District Recycled Water Expansion (District Project No. C133656)
12 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015071073
Lead Agency
Jurupa Community Services District
Document Title
Addendum No. 2 to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Jurupa Community Services District Recycled Water Expansion (District Project No. C133656)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/27/2016
Present Land Use
Primarily roadway rights-of-way; other land use designations and zoning are residential, commercial, agricultural
Document Description
Schleisman Road, past Hellman Ave. in Pine Ave.; City of Chino, County of San Bernardino and City of Eastvale, CA. The facilities for analysis in Addendum No. 2 includes the extension of the recycled water pipeline proposed in Schleisman Road approx. 2,477 feet west in Pine Ave. past Hellman Ave. in the City of Chino. Schleisman Road turns into Pine Ave. at the City boundary. The pipeline extension is proposed to provide a second connection to existing IEUA infrastructure. No other revisions to the Original Project are proposed.
Contact Information
Name
Liza Munoz
Agency Name
San Bernardino County
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Chino, Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, Ontario
Counties
Riverside, San Bernardino
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
I-15; SR-60
Airports
Chino
Schools
Various
Waterways
Santa Ana River
Township
2/3S
Range
6/7W
Section
Varies
Base
SBB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Chino Basin Regional Financing Authority
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.