Spring Garden Bridge Rehabilitation Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0200-R2)
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015052047
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 2
Document Title
Spring Garden Bridge Rehabilitation Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2015-0200-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/22/2016
Present Land Use
USFS land, Union Pacific right-of-way, Caltrans right-of-way
Document Description
Permittee proposes to rehabilitate the existing Spring Garden Bridge and Overhead on SR 70. The rehabilitated Bridge will maintain the existing Bridge alignment. The rehabilitated bridge structure will provide a 12-ft wide lane in each direction, with eight-ft-wide shoulders. The existing Metal Beam Guard Rail and approach rail will be removed and upgraded to meet standard. Existing paint will be removed and existing girders will be repainted. Ice warning conduit and conductors will be relocated within the widened roadway. The existing concrete bridge deck will be replaced. Abutments 1 and 8 will be widened. All of the bents will be widened to support the wider bridge.
Contact Information
Name
Juan Lopez Torres
Agency Name
CDFW North Central
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Quincy
Counties
Plumas
Cross Streets
SR 70, Old State Highway 402A
Zip
95915
Total Acres
20.6
Parcel #
USFS, UP, and Caltrans ROW
State Highways
Hwy 70
Railways
UPRR
Waterways
Greenhorn Creek, Squirrel Creek, Estray Creek
Township
24N
Range
10E
Section
25
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.