BAE Hollister Test Facility Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Amendment No. 2 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2015-018-04 (ITP))
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2014121033
Lead Agency
San Benito County
Document Title
BAE Hollister Test Facility Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Amendment No. 2 (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2015-018-04 (ITP))
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/30/2017
Present Land Use
munitions testing, cattle grazing / Agriculture Productive, Agriculture Rangeland, and Rural
Document Description
Amendment No. 2 makes one specific change to the ITP as originally issued. Amendment No. 2 revises ITP Condition of Approval 7.8 (Dry Season Work) to extend the dry season from Oct. 31 to Dec. 1. The Project will result in temporarily impacts to 1.18 acres of CA tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) habitat. The Project is expected to result in incidental take of CA tiger salamander, which is designated as a threatened species under the CESA. The ITP referenced above as issued by CDFW authorizes incidental take of species listed under CESA that may occur as a result of Project implementation.
Contact Information
Name
Brandon Sanderson
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Hollister
Counties
San Benito
Cross Streets
John Smith Road and Fairview Road
Zip
95023
Total Acres
13.5
Parcel #
0251000080, -90, 0251900570, -80
State Highways
Hwy 25
Schools
Cerra Vista ES
Township
13S
Range
6E
Section
5
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.