SR Truck Lane (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0059-R6)
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2014061054
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 8
Document Title
SR Truck Lane (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0059-R6)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/10/2018
Present Land Use
highway
Document Description
The Project will consist of the construction of a truck climbing lane in the east bound direction, and a truck descending lane in the west bound direction of SR 60 between PM 22.2 (Gilman Springs Road) to PM 26.5. The Project will impact features subject to Fish and Game Code section 1602 that drain into the San Timoteo Creek within the San Jacinto River watershed by filling/excavating soil, extending culverts, adding reinforced concrete arches and reinforced steel pipes, removing/adding headwalls, adding grouted metal pipe at inlets, and making wildlife crossing by cutting and contouring land and constructing a new drainage system. The construction of the Project will permanently impact 0.52 acres of Fish and Game Code section 1602 resources.
Contact Information
Name
Kim Romich
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Beaumont, Moreno Valley
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
SR-60, Gilman Springs Road, Jack Rabbit Trail Rd
Zip
92555
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
SR-60
Railways
UPRR
Waterways
San Timoteo Creek
Township
3
Range
2W
Section
2-6
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.