West of Devers Upgrade Project
14 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2014051041
Lead Agency
California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC)
Document Title
West of Devers Upgrade Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/7/2020
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed an amendment for Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2017-0064-R6, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Southern California Edison. The amendment involves a project description change at several tower location sites; however, the impacts were already accounted for as permanent impacts in the original agreement. The proposed scour protection countermeasures will support the long-term viability of the project. The addition of scour protection countermeasures will occur at a 0.001-acre site at 6S41-2, a 0.001-acre at 6S41-3, a 0.004-acre site at 6S41-4, and a less than 0.0005-acre site at 6N42-2. Overall, the project description change includes 0.006 acres.
This
Contact Information
Name
Brandy Wood
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Southern California Edison
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
Riverside, San Bernardino
Regions
Southern California
Other Location Info
The project is located largely within an existing utility corridor that runs parallel with Interstate 10, passing through the Cities of Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Colton, Grand Terrace, Loma Linda, Palm Springs, Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands, San Bernardino, and Yucaipa and unincorporated areas of Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, State of California.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes