McKinley Avenue Bridge Erosion Repair Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2014-0401-R3)

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2013082082
Lead Agency
City of Stockton
Document Title
McKinley Avenue Bridge Erosion Repair Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2014-0401-R3)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/16/2015
Present Land Use
Land use consists of an existing bridge within existing City right-of-way. No General Plan or zoning designations
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2014-0401-R3, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, City of Stockton as represented by Ray Deyto. The project is limited to repair of a bridge foundation by excavating the stream channel surrounding the bridge foundations to a maximum depth of 2 feet below the bed of the north Branch of French Camp Slough. The excavated area will be replaced with geofabric and rock slope protection. The bridge deck will also be resurfaced. The wing walls will be repaired. No widening or other alterations of the existing bridge shall occur.

Contact Information

Name
Andrea Boerien
Agency Name
CDFW Bay Delta Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Stockton
Counties
San Joaquin
Cross Streets
Sperry Road
Zip
95202
State Highways
I-5
Railways
UPRR
Airports
No
Schools
No
Waterways
North Branch of French Campu Slough
Township
1N
Range
7E
Section
25
Base
MDB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print