Fort Goff Creek Fish Passage Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2013052023
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 2
Document Title
Fort Goff Creek Fish Passage Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/21/2013
Present Land Use
Highway right of way
Document Description
Caltrans has prepared a Draft Initial Study with a proposed MND for a proposed fish passage improvement project on SR 96 in Siskiyou County near Seiad Valley. The proposed project will improve fish passage on Fort Goff Creek by replacing a 15-foot diameter structural steel plate culvert with a concrete single span bridge structure and restore approximately 200 feet of stream channel. The proposed project will also conform a 720-foot section of SR 96 with the proposed bridge structure, which would include widening existing lanes and roadway shoulders, minor roadway realignment and installation of metal beam guardrail. The project will require right of way acquisition, tree removal, soil excavation, a temporary stream diversion, and temporary traffic detour during construction.
Contact Information
Name
Brian Humphrey
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation, District 2
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Siskiyou
Cross Streets
State Route 96 & Fort Goff Creek
Zip
96033
Total Acres
<2
Parcel #
State Highway
State Highways
Hwy 96
Waterways
Fort Goff Creek / Klamath River
Township
47N
Range
12W
Section
32
Other Location Info
Seiad Valley
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Caltrans
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.