Scotts Valley Multi-Agency Regional Intertie Project

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2013032039
Lead Agency
San Lorenzo Valley Water District
Document Title
Scotts Valley Multi-Agency Regional Intertie Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/10/2013
Present Land Use
Public/Quasi Public High Density Residential, Open Space, Park, Mountain Residential and Suburban Residential
Document Description
The California Department of Public Health (Department) is a responsible agency for this project. The Department's Safe Drinking Water Proposition 50 Program is providing state funds for the project. The Scott's Valley Water District (applicant) proposes to construct emergency interties to connect the water service areas of five community water systems operated by Santa Cruz Water Department, Scotts Valley Water District, San Lorenzo Valley Water District, and Mount Hermon Association, Inc. This is to advise that the Department has conditionally approved a grant for the project described above in the amount of $3,917,000 on November 5, 2013 from Chapter 3, Proposition 50, the Water Security, Clean Drinking Water District, San Lorenzo Valley Water District, and Mount Hermon Association, Inc.

Contact Information

Name
James Mueller
Agency Name
CA Department of Public Health
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Scotts Valley
Counties
Santa Cruz
Cross Streets
Zayante Rd & Dr, Graham Hill Rd, Lake Bldg, Mt. Hermon, Skypark, La Madrona
Zip
95018
Total Acres
4.44
Parcel #
022-23-120, 074-111-02, etc.
State Highways
Hwy 9, 17
Railways
Yes
Schools
Yes
Waterways
Zayante Creek, San Lorenzo River, Bean Creek
Township
10S
Range
2W
Section
2,14,1
Other Location Info
Felton, Lompico

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CA Department of Public Health
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print