Arcata Coastal Rail with Trail Connectivity: Humboldt Bay Trail North Construction
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2013032008
Lead Agency
City of Arcata
Document Title
Arcata Coastal Rail with Trail Connectivity: Humboldt Bay Trail North Construction
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/18/2016
Present Land Use
Multiple City zones - City & NCRA ROW, Natural Resource, Public Facility; Industrial Limited Resid. Low Density, Co. NR, MG
Document Description
Construct 3 miles of Class I ADA-accessible, non-motorized, multi-use, paved trail from Hwy 255, through Arcata Marsh, south along Humboldt Bay to Brainards Slough. Trail will follow existing railroad beds & trails on existing ROW/properties. it will have a 10-foot wide paved, 2-inch thick asphalt surface with 2-foot shoulders. 5 bridge crossings will be installed (Butcher, Gannon, Jacoby Creek, Old Jacoby Creek sloughs, one wetland area in north part of Arcata Marsh 1 viewing platform, several benches and interpretive/way-finding signs will be installed. Bridges will be 10-feet wide, with 4-foot guard rails. Approx. 3,500 cu yards cut and 10,440 cu yards fill for trail grade.
Contact Information
Name
Su Corbaley
Agency Name
State Coastal Conservancy
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Arcata
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Trail from Sunset Ave through Arcata and west of Hwy 101 to Bracut intersection
Zip
95521
Total Acres
4.5
Parcel #
multiple
State Highways
Hwy 101, 255
Railways
NCRA
Airports
No
Schools
Arcata HS
Waterways
Jolly Giant & Jacoby Creek, Gannon & Butcher Slough
Township
6N
Section
32
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
State Coastal Conservancy
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.