Marsh Creek Detention Facility Bridge Replacement Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2013022059
Lead Agency
Contra Costa County
Document Title
Marsh Creek Detention Facility Bridge Replacement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/25/2013
Present Land Use
The project size is zoned as general agriculture (A-2) and surrounding parcels are (R-40) to the SW and (F-R) to the SE.
Document Description
Contra Costa County Public Works Department (County) is proposing the replacement of the existing Marsh Creek Detention Facility Bridge over Marsh Creek, adjustment of approximately 300 feet of roadway to accommodate the new bridge, and limited modification of the creek bank to prevent future erosion. The bridge replacement is necessary due to significant deterioration of bridge structures (timber decking, deck places, and rail posts) and the scouring action of Marsh Creek upstream of the current bridge's east and west abutments. The scouring caused by Marsh Creek could render the current bridge unsafe for use until repaired and strand facility personnel and inmates.
Contact Information
Name
Kimani Birden
Agency Name
Contra Costa County
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Clayton
Counties
Contra Costa
Zip
94517
Parcel #
078-120-011
Waterways
Marsh Creek
Township
1N
Range
1E
Section
33
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Contra Costa County Public Works Dept.
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.