Phillips 66 Santa Maria Facility Inactive Coke Storage Area, Remediation Action Plan
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012121019
Lead Agency
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Document Title
Phillips 66 Santa Maria Facility Inactive Coke Storage Area, Remediation Action Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/15/2013
Present Land Use
Zoning / General Plan Designation: Industrial
Document Description
Note: Withdrawn, per lead on 03/21/13.
Removal of approximately 10,000 cubic yards of soil and debris mounds containing petroleum coke that are impacted with vanadium and nickel that is associated with brick and slag from a former calciner unit at the Philips 66 Santa Maria Facility. The soil and debris mounds will be removed with loaders and an excavator, loaded onto rail cars at the refinery, and transported to a waste receiving facility in Utah. The soil and debris mounds containing petroleum coke are not associated with the current refinery active coke storage operations.
Contact Information
Name
Martin Hermann
Agency Name
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Arroyo Grande
Counties
San Luis Obispo
Cross Streets
Willow Road & Hwy 1
Zip
93420
Total Acres
5
State Highways
Hwy 1
Railways
Union Pacific
Airports
No
Schools
Lopez High School
Waterways
No
Township
11N
Range
35W
Section
17
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
DTSC
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.