Permit No. 19388: Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District EchoWater Project
12 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012052017
Lead Agency
Sacramento Regional Sanitation District
Document Title
Permit No. 19388: Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District EchoWater Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/4/2020
Document Description
Approval of Permit No. 19388, under California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 6, for work within an adopted plan of flood control, within a Regulated Stream (Table 8.1; Title 23, Div. 1, Article 8): To replace the existing polypropylene liner of Emergency Storage Basin D (ESB-D) w/ a 6-inch reinforced shotcrete levee slope & ?-inch jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) floors; To remove the existing asphalt road on top of ESB-D levee, lime treat to 12 inches, and replace with a ?-inch-thick JPCP roadway slab; To install a 12-inch diameter underdrain system 10 feet from the levee toe; To remove & replace an existing concrete stairway on the landside levee slope of ESB-D.
Contact Information
Name
Jennifer Stewart
Agency Name
Central Valley Flood Protection Bd
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (Regional San)
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Elk Grove
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
8521 Laguna Station Road
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes