Revised SMP-30 Use Permit, Sunol Valley Aggregate Quarry
9 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2011102051
Lead Agency
Alameda County
Document Title
Revised SMP-30 Use Permit, Sunol Valley Aggregate Quarry
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/9/2015
Present Land Use
County General Plan: "Water Management"; County zoning: A: Agriculture, subject to County Surface Mining Ordinance
Document Description
This project is part of the continuous of current Alameda County Surface Mining Permit 30 (SMP 30) quarry operations as well as the 58-acre quarry expansion. The Permittee is expanding the overall production potential of the quarry by increasing the area under the permit by approximately 58 acres. The expanded quarry pit will occupy approximately 32.5 acres and a haul road and berm will occupy 2.44 acres within the 58-acre expansion area. Within the Revised SMP 30 permit boundaries, the active quarry will occupy 310 acres and remove an ephemeral stream channel. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement Number 1600-2013-0128-3 pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Jim Summers/Oliver de Silva, Inc.
Contact Information
Name
Marcia Grefsrud
Agency Name
CDFW Bay Delta Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
I-680 / Calaveras Road
Total Acres
381
Parcel #
096-0080-008, 096-0375-011-05
State Highways
I-680
Waterways
Alameda Creek, San Antonio Creek
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Sunol
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.