Jurupa Community Services District-Rubidoux Community Services District Interconnection Booster Pump Station and Pipeline Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2011081063
Lead Agency
Jurupa Community Services District
Document Title
Jurupa Community Services District-Rubidoux Community Services District Interconnection Booster Pump Station and Pipeline Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/28/2013
Present Land Use
Area of the booster pump station: Low Density Residential; area of the new pipeline: Light Industrial
Document Description
The California Department of Public Health (Department) is a responsible agency for this project. The Department's Safe Drinking Water Proposition 50 Program is providing state funds for the project. The Rubidoux Community Services District proposes to construct approximately 4,600 feet of 24-inch diameter pipeline, 300 feet of 16-inch diameter pipeline and interconnection booster station.
Contact Information
Name
Eldon Horst
Agency Name
Jurupa Community Services District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Mission Boulevard/Golden West Avenue/Sedona Drive
Zip
92509
Total Acres
0.28
Parcel #
183-174-001
State Highways
Hwy 60
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Flabob
Schools
Yes
Waterways
West Riverside Canal Lateral Numbers 1 and 2
Township
2S
Range
5W
Section
8
Base
SBB&M
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Jurupa Valley
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Jurupa Community Services District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.