Long-Term Water Transfers Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Stmt
16 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2011011010
Lead Agency
San Luis and Delta Mendota Water Authority
Document Title
Long-Term Water Transfers Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Stmt
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/16/2020
Document Description
The Long-Term Water Transfers EIR/EIS evaluates a range of potential water transfers from willing sellers to meet existing demands of buyers. Water transfers could occur through groundwater substitution, cropland idling, reservoir release, and conservation and could include individual and multiyear transfers from 2019 through 2024, subject to annual review and approval. Transfers could originate in Colusa, Butte, Glenn, Merced, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, Shasta, Solano, Sutter, Tehama, Yolo or Yuba Counties. Transfer buyers could be in Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno, Kings, Merced, San Benito, San Joaquin, Stanislaus or Santa Clara counties.
Contact Information
Name
John Currey
Agency Name
ACID
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
Butte, Colusa, Glenn, Merced
Other Location Info
Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, Shasta, Solano, Sutter, Tehama, Yolo or Yuba Counties. Transfer buyers could be in Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno, Kings, Merced, San Benito, San Joaquin, Stanislaus or Santa Clara counties.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID)
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes